Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Toggle navigation

EMEA

MENTOR® MemoryGel® Xtra
Breast Implants

MENTOR® MemoryGel® Xtra feels more like natural breast tissue 1,2,*, while also giving you more options for choosing a look you love.

Why Choose MemoryGel® Xtra?

MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants give you all the benefits of MemoryGel® Breast Implants, but with additional benefits in two profile options – Moderate Plus and High Profile.

MemoryGel Xtra Implant

 

A Soft, Natural Feel Patients Desire**,3 with Increased Projection, Fullness and Firmness4,5

Increase Breast Implant Projection

Increased Projection

In 90% of the corresponding profiles, MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants provide more projection by base width than implants from another leading brand (all cohesive levels).***,6

Increased Breast Implant Fullness

Increased Fullness

MemoryGel® Xtra implants are precision-filled and provide increased fullness when compared to MemoryGel® Breast Implants.4,5

Increased Breast Implant Firmness

Increased Firmness

The cohesive gel in MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants feels soft and natural, with increased firmness over MemoryGel® Breast Implants for women desiring that feel.†,‡,5

A Name You Can Trust

MENTOR® MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants are part of the long-trusted MemoryGel® family.7-16

MENTOR Commitment to Safety
MENTOR® COMMITMENT TO SAFETY

Over 200,000 patients have been enrolled in over 10 clinical studies, providing a robust data set to evaluate the safety and performance of our implants.7-16

Preferred by 9 out of 10 Consumers
PREFERRED BY 9 OUT OF 10 CONSUMERS

In a blinded comparison with another major brand, 9 out of 10 consumers chose MENTOR® MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants as feeling more like natural breasts.|,3

Surgeons prefer Memorygel Xtra
SURGEONS PREFER MEMORYGEL® XTRA

In a global blinded comparison with another major brand, surgeons more often chose MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants as the product they would use most often at their practice.§,3

References

* As compared to saline-filled breast implants

** In-person consumer survey with 452 respondents.

*** Published projection dimensions were compared between MemoryGel® Xtra Moderate Plus Profile vs. Inspira Moderate Profile and MemoryGel® Xtra High Profile vs. Inspira Full Profile.

† Head-to-head compression benchtop testing between MemoryGel® Xtra and MemoryGel® Breast Implants.

‡ Head-to-head compression benchtop testing between MemoryGel® Xtra (n=4) and Natrelle Inspira (n=3).

| Head-to-head blinded in-person tabletop product comparison (MemoryGel® Xtra vs. Inspira Responsive vs. Inspira Cohesive) with 452 respondents

§ Head-to-head in-person tabletop product comparison (MemoryGel® Xtra vs. Inspira Responsive vs. Inspira Cohesive) with 79 surgeons

1. Spear S, Jespersen, MR. Breast Implants: Saline or Silicone? Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2010; 30:557.

2. Bondurant, S., Ernster, V., and Herdman, R. . "Safety of Silicone Implants." Washington, DC: National Academy Press(1999) Page 58.

3. MENTOR Consumer Preference Market Research Report - July 2017

4. Product Dimensions for MemoryGel® and MemoryGel® Xtra Breast Implants

5. Mentor R&D Compression Benchtop Testing - July 2017

6. Allergan Natrelle Inspira Product Catalog 2017

7. Summary of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel® Silicone Gel-Filled Implants in Patients who are Undergoing Primary Breast Augmentation, Primary Breast Reconstruction, or Revision. 10-Year Core Gel Final Clinical Study Report. April 2013.

8. MemoryGel® Post Approval Study Seventh Annual Report, November 5, 2013.

9. Adjunct Study Final Report for Mentor’s MemoryGel® Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants, 02 November 2012.

10. Mentor Worldwide, LLC. MemoryShapeTM Post-Approval Cohort Study (formerly Contour Profile Gel Core Study) Final Clinical Study Report. 02 June 2015.

11. Mentor Becker Expander/Breast Implant Clinical Trial 2013 Annual Report.

12. Adjunct Study Annual Report for Mentor's Becker Adjustable Breast Implants: Year 18 (September 1992-November 2010) October 3, 2011.

13. CPG Styles Study: A Study of the Safety of the Contour Profile Gel Breast Implants in Subjects who are Undergoing Primary Breast Augmentation, Primary Breast Reconstruction, or Revision. 2015.

14. MemoryShapeTM Post-Approval Continued Access Study (formerly Contour Profile Gel Continued Access Study). 2014.

15. Athena Study annual report (Sept 2018): A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Mentor® Smooth and Textured Larger Size MemoryGel® Ultra High Profile (UHP-L) Breast Implants in Subjects who are Undergoing Primary Breast Reconstruction or Revision Reconstruction.

16. Glow Study annual report (Feb 2018): Memory Gel and Shape Combined Cohort Post Approval Study

References

127133-191106 EMEA